home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1590>
- <title>
- Nov. 14, 1994: Books:The Unheard Witnesses
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Nov. 14, 1994 How Could She Do It?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ARTS & MEDIA/BOOKS, Page 101
- The Unheard Witnesses
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> In a new book, friends and colleagues assert that Clarence Thomas
- was not the saint his defenders made him out to be
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Lacayo
- </p>
- <p> The 1991 face-off between Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill was
- partly a Supreme Court confirmation fight, partly a character-assassination
- attempt. What's still at issue is whose character was taking
- the shots. After three days of swampy Senate testimony, most
- Americans were convinced that Long Dong Silver was a man the
- Bureau of Weights and Measures should know about. Not as many
- were sure who was telling the truth about Hill's claims that
- Thomas sexually harassed her when he was the Reagan-appointed
- head of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission EEOC and
- she was a 25-year-old staffer. Though public opinion eventually
- tilted in Hill's favor, there are still people waiting for the
- cold-eyed judgment of history to clear things up.
- </p>
- <p> Pending that, the judgment of journalists with book contracts
- will have to do. Last year David Brock, a writer for the bratty
- conservative monthly the American Spectator, published The Real
- Anita Hill, which suggested that Hill was a woman romantically
- obsessed with Thomas. "Nutty, and a bit slutty," he called her.
- Now comes Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas (Houghton
- Mifflin; $24.95), in which Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson, reporters
- for the Wall Street Journal, offer a picture of Thomas as a
- man possessed by racial resentments and by good-looking female
- staffers, whose assets he was not above pointing out to them,
- loudly and often. In other words, nutty and a bit slutty-minded.
- </p>
- <p> The authors conclude that "the preponderance of the evidence
- suggests" that Thomas lied under oath when he told the committee
- he had not harassed Hill. Their book doesn't quite nail that
- conclusion. Yet its portrait of Thomas as an id suffering in
- the role of a Republican superego is more detailed and convincing
- than anything that has appeared so far. Which is not to say
- that the book justifies the waves of hype it rides in on, including
- a nomination for the National Book Award. For one thing, the
- crucial stories told by Angela Wright and Rose Jourdain--two
- of four women who came to Washington prepared to testify in
- support of Hill but who were kept waiting by the committee and
- then dismissed before they could appear--were first reported
- more than two years ago.
- </p>
- <p> Mayer and Abramson make their most original contribution in
- the sections that draw a picture of Thomas' personality, which
- were based on interviews with dozens of people who knew him.
- By the time he got to law school at Yale, they write, Thomas
- was already known "not only for the extreme crudity of his sexual
- banter, but also for avidly watching pornographic films and
- reading pornographic magazines, which he would describe to his
- friends in lurid detail." Acquaintances say when they heard
- testimony that Thomas had asked who put a pubic hair on his
- Coke can, they recognized his characteristic style. The proprietor
- of a Washington video store near EEOC headquarters tells the
- authors that Thomas was a regular in the X-rated section. A
- lawyer who knew him then recalls running into Thomas at the
- register renting The Adventures of Bad Mama Jama. Kaye Savage,
- a friend who once dropped by the bachelor apartment Thomas took
- after separating from his first wife, recalls that the walls
- were covered with Playboy centerfolds.
- </p>
- <p> There is nothing in the Constitution that prohibits prospective
- Supreme Court Justices from decorating their apartments like
- a college dorm room. But it's not out of order to inquire into
- the frame of mind of a man accused of sexual harassment, especially
- when one of his chief lines of defense was that he was too much
- the straight arrow to have done such a thing. While a truckload
- of centerfolds would not make Thomas guilty of anything, other
- than a weakness for erotic redundancy, it might disqualify him
- as the plaster saint fashioned by his supporters.
- </p>
- <p> Mayer and Abramson blame committee chairman Joseph Biden for
- the fact that the four women who came to Washington to corroborate
- Hill's story were never called to testify. In their view, Biden
- simply abdicated control of the hearings to Republican Senators
- intent on seeing Thomas confirmed. Yet the fact that the chief
- witness, Angela Wright, had been fired by Thomas might also
- have made it easy to dismiss her claims as sour grapes. What
- we know for certain is that Hill was left as the sole accuser,
- and Thomas was confirmed, 52 to 48, the narrowest vote for any
- 20th century Justice. "I'm going to be here for 40 years," Thomas
- recently told an invited gathering of African Americans. "For
- those who don't like it, get over it." Get over it? Not likely
- anytime soon. Not for him. Not for Hill. Not for us.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-